|
|
|
Previous Next |
|
The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

Cast: Martin Freeman, Mos Def, Zooey Deschanel, Warwick Davis, Sam Rockwell, Alan Rickman, John Malkovich
Directed by: Garth Jennings
 Available At:
hitchhikers.movies.go.com
|
|
|
Abstract: A partially successful adaptation of the sci-fi cult classic book by
Douglas Adams.
If you're like me, having read The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy in junior high (and numerous time subsequently!), you'll likely be a tough critic to attempts to bring the book to the big screen. Fortunately, though many details are missed, the movie does capture the zany fun of the book. (Perhaps partially due to the fact that Adams did work on the screenplay before his death in 2001.)
A good cast romps through the well- known antics of the mixed group of humans and aliens (and robots), after the destruction of the earth due to the building of an interstellar freeway. Martin Freeman (BBC's 'The Office' alumni) is most especially effective here as Arthur Dent, reprising his familiar self-effacing everyman character (As only a Brit can, it seems). I also very much enjoyed Sam Rockwell as the alien Zaphod Beeblebrox, and a cameo from John Malkovitch was very welcome.
I was pleased to see that the bad guys of the piece, the gruesome alien race known as the Vogons, were created with puppetry, not cgi. While cgi certainly has it's place, in comedy close-ups, the puppets did a far superior job, avoiding the notoriously bad Jar Jar effect. My one major compliant with the film was the gratuitously added romance. While certainly hinted at in the books, the liaison tends to undercut the spirit of silliness and satire that has make the books so beloved.
Review by Debbie
|
Credit: hitchhikers.movies.go.com
|
REVIEW LIST
|
Average Review Rating:
|
 |
This could have been a very good movie, but tragically, it suffers from its makers trying to squeeze too much into too small a space (ironically).
I haven’t read the book, but I have seen the old TV series, which I thought was wonderful and so I feel that I can legitimately comment on went wrong here: the makers of it (including, strangely, the original author: the late Douglas Adams) seem to have wanted to fill the film with as many of the clever ideas from the books as they could. And there are cool ideas. From the knife that toasts the bread while it slices, to the planet manufacturing shop. But unfortunately, in their quest to fit in all those cool inventions and environments in the time-limitations of one movie, they forgot about putting together a coherent plot.
Instead, it views like a collage. It seemed to me, as I was watching it, that anything could happen at anytime and it was hard even to know why after it happened; there just weren’t any understandable rules to the universe for me to grasp onto. And so I myself was lost through much of the film. Instead, I could enjoy or not enjoy particular scenes, but the movie itself should have gone through several more drafts before it came to theatres.
|
|
|
I haven't read the book but of course my boyfriend is a huge fan and dragged me along. I figured it was going to be too much of a guy flick but I was pleasantly surprised.
It was funny and intriguing in a kind of pseudo philosophical way. And I'm a big fan of the actor who played Tim from "The Office"!
|
|
|
I want my 8 bucks back! I was drawn in by all the hype of this movie, and was very disappointed. I should have realized I wouldn't like it when all the guys who were touting it kept comparing it to the "brilliant" Monty Python (sarcasm intended).
On that note, I can't think of one female friend of mine who actually likes Monty Python! Anyone here a fan? My provisional theory is that it's purely a guy thing.
|
|
|
|
Have Your Own Opinion?
|
|
|